Agentery pricing intelligence · Provider profile · License Guard
Provider profile · independently tracked by Agentery
License Guard
Decides whether an open source dependency's license **actually obligates you** — given how your project ships. Generic license scanners answer a different que…
Agentery price verdictNo pricing observed
Billing model—
Last checked24 Aug 2026pricing & liveness
What it does
The specific capability behind this listing, and where to get it.
Decides whether an open source dependency's license **actually obligates you** — given how your project ships. Generic license scanners answer a different question ("what license is this?") and then warn on everything. LicenseGuard evaluates the license against your distribution model, so the same license produces different verdicts: | How you ship | AGPL-3.0 dependency | |---|---| | SaaS (network-accessible) | **blocked** — §13 network clause | | Internal use only | allowed | | Distributed binary / on-prem | **blocked** — inherited GPL distribution terms | | **devDependency** (never in the artifact) | **allowed** | That last row is the point. A build-time linter under AGPL never ships, so it triggers nothing — but tools that warn on it anyway train people to ignore every warning they produce. The same distinctions run through the rest of the license landscape, and they are not interchangeable: - **GPL** obligations attach to *distribution*. Running GPL code as a network service i
MCPMCPautonomy: workflow automation
Official License Guard links
Price status · observed daily
No public commercial pricing observed.
No price does not imply the product is free. Any code-host platform pricing is excluded.
Is License Guard good value?
Price is straightforward; the useful comparison is capability, compatibility and operational cost.
No price benchmark
No public commercial pricing observed.
Agentery has not observed a public price for this provider. No price does not mean free.
Observed commercial pricenone
Niche—
Price benchmarknot applicable
What to compare instead
Check capability before deciding
Compare capability, compatibility and operational cost against comparable providers — Agentery keeps the price status explicit and never invents a verdict.
License Guard's local market
Nearest products by what they do.
L
LicenseGuardmcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
G
graspmcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
IL
IP Licensing AI Agentagent
$999/moobserved monthly
View profile →
D
devtreeagent
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
C
codeindexmcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
D
Driftwatchmcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
See the MCP response behind this page · get_agent_profile()
See the MCP response behind this pageget_agent_profile
{
"agent_id": "license_guard",
"name": "License Guard",
"url": "https://licenseguard.tenchorooms.com",
"logo": "https://agentery.com/logos/CP-ZKQKR3.svg",
"niche": null,
"category": null,
"short_summary": "Decides whether an open source dependency's license **actually obligates you** — given how your project ships.\n\nGeneric license scanners answer a different que…",
"task_performed": "Decides whether an open source dependency's license **actually obligates you** — given how your project ships.\n\nGeneric license scanners answer a different question (\"what license is this?\") and then warn on everything. LicenseGuard evaluates the license against your distribution model, so the same license produces different verdicts:\n\n| How you ship | AGPL-3.0 dependency |\n|---|---|\n| SaaS (network-accessible) | **blocked** — §13 network clause |\n| Internal use only | allowed |\n| Distributed binary / on-prem | **blocked** — inherited GPL distribution terms |\n| **devDependency** (never in the artifact) | **allowed** |\n\nThat last row is the point. A build-time linter under AGPL never ships, so it triggers nothing — but tools that warn on it anyway train people to ignore every warning they produce.\n\nThe same distinctions run through the rest of the license landscape, and they are not interchangeable:\n\n- **GPL** obligations attach to *distribution*. Running GPL code as a network service i",
"inputs_accepted": [],
"outputs_produced": [],
"integrations_available": [
"MCP"
],
"protocols_or_interfaces": [
"MCP"
],
"industry_fit": [
"developer tools"
],
"autonomy_level": "workflow automation",
"human_approval_needed": "unclear",
"pricing_model": "unclear",
"price": {
"observed": false,
"billing": "not_found",
"currency": null,
"lowest_monthly_usd": null,
"monthly_usd": null,
"headline": "No public price found",
"summary": "No public price found on the vendor site.",
"confidence": "high",
"source_url": "https://licenseguard.tenchorooms.com/",
"checked_at": "2026-08-23T04:20:12.986Z",
"amount": null,
"display": null,
"plans": [],
"source": "render+llm"
},
"trust_or_rating_signal": [],
"evidence_quality": "medium",
"entity_type": "infrastructure",
"regulated_data_suitability": "unclear",
"evidence_urls": [
"https://licenseguard.tenchorooms.com"
],
"last_checked": "2026-08-21",
"how_to_connect": {
"website": "https://licenseguard.tenchorooms.com",
"docs": null,
"mcp": null,
"a2a": null,
"api": null,
"protocols": [
"MCP"
],
"note": "Speaks MCP but publishes no endpoint we could verify — check the docs/website."
},
"liveness": {
"probed": true,
"alive": true,
"endpoint_kind": "site",
"latency_ms": 705,
"uptime_7d": 1,
"checked_at": "2026-08-24T02:35:24.839Z",
"consecutive_failures": 0,
"status": "alive"
},
"price_extras": {
"free_tier": null,
"unit_cost": null
},
"reported_success": null,
"feedback": "If you use this listing, call report_outcome afterwards — it sharpens rankings for everyone including you."
}