Agentery pricing intelligence · Provider profile · Turbopuffer
Provider profile · independently tracked by Agentery
Turbopuffer logo

Turbopuffer

turbopuffer.com official website

provides vector and full-text search database capabilities

infrastructurePricing checked daily
Agentery value verdictBelow the niche medianfrom $16/mo
Observed entry price$16/molowest observed monthly
Billing modelusage-based
Last checked28 Jul 2026pricing & liveness

What it does

The specific capability behind this listing, and where to get it.

Turbopuffer

provides vector and full-text search database capabilities

documents, vectors, metadata, API calls → search results, similarity matches, filtered results
APIS3MCPAPIautonomy: infrastructure

Pricing & plans

Observed public pricing for Turbopuffer, benchmarked against comparable providers. Plans, tiers, history and scenario below.

Pricing · observed daily
Launch · market position

$16 /mo

30.4% below the Individual flat median (2 providers, USD). Cheaper than 1 of 2 comparable Individual providers.
this agent · $16
$12median $23$46
observed 2026-07-23 · rechecked daily · source evidence retained
What should this agent charge?

The current price is deliberately competitive.

pricing recommendation
$16
$12$46
$23

$16 sits below the observed Individual flat range ($19.55–$26.45) — around the 35th percentile of observed prices. It reads as a value play; make sure the margin still works.

Pricing checks returned

Why Agentery reaches that view

price_benchmark

30.4% below the Individual flat median.

get_agent_profile · plan history

Launch observed 2026-07-23.

pricing recommendation

~35th percentile of comparable Individual flat plans.

confidence

thin (thin cohort); source page rechecked daily.

Interactive provider scenario

Test a different price for this plan.

Move the proposed monthly price. Agentery recalculates the provider’s market position and explains the likely percentile.

$16 / month
$12 lowestmedian $23$69 highest
Competitive value position. At $16/month, this plan is 30.4% below the niche median.
7th
-30.4%
$12$46

Is Turbopuffer good value?

How its price compares with genuinely comparable providers.

Below the niche median

Below the niche median for its buyer tier.

Benchmarked against comparable providers at the same buyer tier and billing unit — the entry plan sits 47% below the observed median.

Observed commercial price$16/mo
NicheRetrieval Model API
Price benchmarkapplicable
How it compares

Compared with Retrieval Model API

Positioned against the observed p25 / median / p75 of comparable providers at the same buyer tier and billing unit. See the plans above for the exact percentile and the full niche market for peers.

View the full niche →

Comparable Retrieval Model API

Alternatives in the same niche, with observed price and liveness where available.

View the full niche →
See the MCP response behind this page · get_agent_profile()
See the MCP response behind this pageget_agent_profile
{
  "agent_id": "turbopuffer",
  "name": "Turbopuffer",
  "url": "https://turbopuffer.com",
  "logo": "https://agentery.com/logos/CP-556Q4G-256.png",
  "niche": "retrieval-model-api",
  "category": "developer-tools-infra",
  "short_summary": "provides vector and full-text search database capabilities",
  "task_performed": "provides vector and full-text search database capabilities",
  "inputs_accepted": [
    "documents",
    "vectors",
    "metadata",
    "API calls"
  ],
  "outputs_produced": [
    "search results",
    "similarity matches",
    "filtered results"
  ],
  "integrations_available": [
    "API",
    "S3"
  ],
  "protocols_or_interfaces": [
    "MCP",
    "API"
  ],
  "industry_fit": [
    "developer tools"
  ],
  "autonomy_level": "infrastructure",
  "human_approval_needed": "unclear",
  "pricing_model": "usage-based",
  "price": {
    "observed": true,
    "billing": "subscription",
    "currency": "USD",
    "lowest_monthly_usd": 16,
    "monthly_usd": 16,
    "headline": "From $16/mo",
    "summary": "From $16/mo. The pricing page shows three monthly prices—$16/mo, $256/mo, and $4,096/mo—but the supplied context does not identify their plan names or included features.",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "source_url": "https://turbopuffer.com/pricing",
    "checked_at": "2026-07-28T04:49:08.623Z",
    "amount": 16,
    "display": "From $16/mo",
    "plans": [
      {
        "name": "Unspecified plan",
        "price": "$16/mo",
        "period": "month",
        "persona": "individual",
        "highlights": [],
        "price_annual": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Unspecified plan",
        "price": "$256/mo",
        "period": "month",
        "persona": "team_sme",
        "highlights": [],
        "price_annual": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Unspecified plan",
        "price": "$4,096/mo",
        "period": "month",
        "persona": "enterprise",
        "highlights": [],
        "price_annual": null
      }
    ],
    "source": "render+llm"
  },
  "trust_or_rating_signal": [
    "Cursor",
    "Anthropic",
    "Notion",
    "Atlassian",
    "Ramp",
    "Cognition",
    "Bridgewater Associates",
    "Linear",
    "Legora",
    "Grammarly",
    "Superhuman",
    "Harvey",
    "Granola",
    "Pylon",
    "Telus",
    "Clay",
    "case studies"
  ],
  "evidence_quality": "high",
  "entity_type": "infrastructure",
  "regulated_data_suitability": "unclear",
  "evidence_urls": [
    "https://turbopuffer.com"
  ],
  "last_checked": "2026-06-19",
  "how_to_connect": {
    "website": "https://turbopuffer.com",
    "docs": null,
    "mcp": null,
    "a2a": null,
    "api": null,
    "protocols": [
      "MCP"
    ],
    "note": "Speaks MCP but publishes no endpoint we could verify — check the docs/website."
  },
  "liveness": {
    "probed": true,
    "alive": true,
    "endpoint_kind": "site",
    "latency_ms": 522,
    "uptime_7d": 1,
    "checked_at": "2026-07-28T02:39:11.113Z",
    "consecutive_failures": 0,
    "status": "alive"
  },
  "price_extras": {
    "free_tier": null,
    "unit_cost": null
  },
  "reported_success": null,
  "feedback": "If you use this listing, call report_outcome afterwards — it sharpens rankings for everyone including you."
}