agentery
$ agentery.com/api/mcpsubmit agent
← Back to search

Market around ursus

Local MCP server and CLI for Bear notes. Enables AI agents to search, create, edit, and manage notes while preserving structure and templates. Includes backup/restore and batch operations.

Visit github.comPricing page ↗

Explore the market

Prices and medians update for the tier you select.

Compare at
ursus · Pro
No Pro plan
Pro-MCP server median
$13.5
across 4 priced MCP servers
vs Pro MCP servers
No comparison
ursus doesn't sell Pro
ⓘ Comparisons are same provider type (MCP server) and same buyer tier (Pro). Never across tiers.
Market density
42nd pctile
47 strong substitutes
Price momentum · 30d
+5.1%
MCP servers · Pro median
$13.5/mo
4 priced · $10–$19.25 mid 50%
Platforms · Pro median
$9.17/mo
2 priced · $5.42–$12.92 mid 50%
Price spectrum · Pro plans · 5 of 10 providers priced · log scale · $1.67$29/mo
MCP servers Platforms◻ shaded = middle 50% · line = median (all types)ursus has no comparable Pro price — not plotted

Products in this market

Ranked by how closely each one matches ursus's job. Prices show each provider's Pro state; entry prices are labelled as such. Unpriced products still belong to the market.

MMCP servers38Ranked by relevance
ursusthis listing
MCP · relevance 100%
no public price
bear_notes_mcp
MCP · relevance 83%
no public price
better_bear
MCP · relevance 82%
no public price
mcp_bear
MCP · relevance 79%
no public price
mcp_apple_notes
MCP · relevance 77%
no public price
flint_note_mcp
MCP · relevance 77%
no public price
Vist
MCP · relevance 76%
$7/mo Pro
-48% vs Pro median
Markdown Locker
MCP · relevance 76%
no public price
silverbullet_mcp
MCP · relevance 75%
no public price
AnchorDB
MCP · relevance 74%
no public price
Local Research Library MCP
MCP · relevance 73%
no public price
donebear
MCP · relevance 72%
no Pro plan
entry $8/mo
Obsidian MCP
MCP · relevance 72%
no public price
outline_mcp_server
MCP · relevance 72%
no public price
mcpvault
MCP · relevance 72%
no public price
apple_notes_mcp
MCP · relevance 71%
no public price
obsidian_mcp_server
MCP · relevance 71%
no public price
note1
MCP · relevance 71%
$16/mo Pro
+19% vs Pro median
nocal_mcp
MCP · relevance 70%
no Pro plan
entry $5/mo
zen_mcp_2
MCP · relevance 70%
no public price
LittleLibrary
MCP · relevance 70%
no public price
Hjarni
MCP · relevance 70%
$11/mo Pro
-19% vs Pro median
DE
dexi
MCP · relevance 70%
no Pro plan
entry $5/mo
agentbrain
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
simplenote_mcp_server
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
IMAP MCP
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
AI Sticky Notes
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
solomd
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
omniclip_rag
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
KI
Kibela Integration Server
MCP · relevance 69%
no Pro plan
entry $10/mo
ai-context-flow
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
liminary
MCP · relevance 69%
$29/mo Pro
+115% vs Pro median
noema
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
llm_wiki_kit
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
mcp_local_memory
MCP · relevance 69%
no public price
sqlite_memory_mcp
MCP · relevance 68%
no public price
knownbase
MCP · relevance 68%
no Pro plan
entry $3/mo
directory_indexer
MCP · relevance 68%
no public price
PPlatforms4Ranked by relevance
vaultr
PLATFORM · relevance 74%
no public price
pileax
PLATFORM · relevance 71%
no public price
hillnote
PLATFORM · relevance 68%
$1.67/mo Pro
-82% vs Pro median
agentmemoryos
PLATFORM · relevance 68%
no public price
FFrameworks2Ranked by relevance
memories_off_skill
FRAMEWORK · relevance 71%
no public price
totem
FRAMEWORK · relevance 69%
no public price
OOther5Ranked by relevance
QMD
OTHER · relevance 71%
no public price
hubble
OTHER · relevance 70%
no public price
kimun
OTHER · relevance 70%
no public price
llm_knowledge_base_blueprint
OTHER · relevance 69%
no public price
chatcrystal
OTHER · relevance 68%
no public price
AAgents1Ranked by relevance
reflect_notes
AGENT · relevance 69%
no public price

Market = the products most similar to this one by capability; prices are median / quartiles over its priced members, separated by provider type and buyer tier.